4 ms·
I'm using Rider on Ubuntu and it's perfectly fine as long as you are developing web-related stuff (WebAPIs, Blazor, MVC). Rider is much better IDE than Visual S
by kertoip_1 4y ago
I'm using Rider on Ubuntu and it's perfectly fine as long as you are developing web-related stuff (WebAPIs, Blazor, MVC). Rider is much better IDE than Visual Studio, also dotnet is really terminal-friendly these days.
A year ago I needed to quickly do something related to Xamarin and as far as I remember I actually had to move to Windows for some reason, but that was the only time. I'm not even sure if it was related to inability to run stuff or it was just too much tinkering to launch that single thing.
- the_cramer 4y agoDo you have one or two points why you like Rider more than VS? Honest curiosity. I never used Rider but i really like VS compared to other code editors (for other languages). To me it's the perfect match for anything .NET/C#.
- kertoip_1 4y ago1. Rider provides really good linting and static code analysis out-of-the box. I've once opened my project that I've been developing in Visual Studio and it gave my a sh*load of actually useful hints on how to improve my code. 2. Typing is also much faster, once you get used to snippets your code just writes itself :) 3. Lots of built in tools, I just didn't even need to install any database management tool as the one built in in Rider is enough for my needs 4. I tend to use mouse in Visual Studio more. Don't know the exact reason, maybe it's because Rider gives a really powerful shortcuts like "Shift+Shift" and "alt+Enter" that are easy to remember and does most of the job. But it may also be, that it's just because it works on Linux. I develop mostly for Linux servers and use Linux tools that obviously integrate better with Linux-based OS than on Windows. There is WSL, but still, experience is not that fluent.
- acedTrex 4y agoRider is for one significantly faster, it also has better solution analysis and refactorings due to it integrating all the resharper ones.