4 ms·
I have found JetBrain's Rider IDE[0] to be sufficient for development on Linux. It is not as heavy weight as Visual Studio but does bridge the gap of convenienc
by juice_bus 4y ago
I have found JetBrain's Rider IDE[0] to be sufficient for development on Linux. It is not as heavy weight as Visual Studio but does bridge the gap of convenience that VS provides.
[0] https://www.jetbrains.com/rider/ https://www.jetbrains.com/rider/
- JamesBarney 4y agoI also feel like VS is getting worse. I run into far more errors and issues now than I did several years ago. My theory is the success of Azure and the end of the era of "Developers developers developers" has caused Microsoft to place less of their best engineers on the tooling team.
- phillipcarter 4y agoThere’s always some degree of a rotating cast of people, that’s always been the case. Really there’s three important factors in perceived VS perf issues: 1. Your codebases have gotten bigger. More projects in a solution and more code in a project means more work the IDE has to do. Various components have their breaking points and it’s not uncommon to hit them. 2. VS is really really really really big. Some components in there run like a well-oiled machine. Others, like those last touched in 2013 and with less than 10k users per month, are rickety and will freeze your UI or cause the GC to freak out or both. If you’re one of those 10k users, whoopsie! 3. For many years the mandate in the VS org at Microsoft was that of a feature factory. That changed around 2016 or so, maybe a little earlier. But cleaning up a decade of feature factory work while still needing to innovate on a growing userbase that throws more and more at the IDE each year is hard.
- torginus 4y agoI don't know -what impressed me about VS 2022, is just how amazingly fast the new UI is - everything is instant now, it's by far the greatest speedup I experienced in a new VS release. Probably it helps that they moved to .NET Core from Framework, and to 64-bit as well.
- phillipcarter 4y agoVS 2022 is still based on .NET Framework. It’s faster because a lot of talented folks worked very hard to improve it :)
- hirvi74 4y agoOkay, I keep seeing people say this, and I have had the complete opposite experience. VS 2022 brings my somewhat beefy work laptop to an absolute crawl sometimes. I can open VS 2017, load a solution, and close VS 2017 all before I can even get to the solution selection screen for VS 2022.
- WorldMaker 4y agoOften a big difference is plugins: check and triple check what plugins you have installed. There's a couple extremely common plugins "everyone loves" that just murder VS performance and everyone blames VS and not the plugins.
- hirvi74 4y agoVsVim is the only plugin I have, and perhaps it's slowing things down that badly, but that would be surprising to me.
- brsiegel 4y ago+1 on this. Previously worked in the developer tools division that builds VS, and whenever someone got assigned to work on a performance or crash bug you'd almost always wind up hearing them mutter "it's f*cking ReSharper again". The VS team has had a huge push in the last few years to improve code analysis, introspection, and refactoring (with Roslyn) specifically to try to replace / kill ReSharper. The company has no animus with JetBrains, and the team has nothing but respect for the value it's added to the ecosystem, but it's by far the biggest source of perf and crash issues in VS. I know people feel like they just can't possibly live without it, but the refactoring tools in VS nowadays are much better, so I encourage folks to test drive by going a couple weeks without installing ReSharper. If you still really miss it and are willing to pay the performance penalty to have it after that, go for it. But give VS a fair shake without it.
- uticus 4y agoCounterpoint: I've been extensively using VS 2019 for years and VS 2022 for a few months. Neither has been notably buggy other than the occasional glitch with Live Unit Testing. For further comparison, I've also used JetBrains products a lot over the past few months. They are also solid and work great.
- WorldMaker 4y agoI don't feel that VS is necessarily getting worse (it's always had weird errors and issues; some people just have nostalgia goggles for certain older versions), but relatedly I feel that VS Code is getting too good. So many new features seem designed for VS Code first and VS integration is an afterthought. An increasing amount of the time I find I want to work in VS Code more and switch over to VS only "when I have to". On the one hand this is great for cross-platform development (as is the topic here), as VS Code is about as cross-platform as it gets. On the other hand it feels increasingly interesting/weird/almost-sad that the expensive flagship of the VS brand sometimes seems to be left behind by its tinier, free (as in beer and speech) counterpart. I don't think your theory is entirely correct, but I think some of it applies here: VS Code started as an Azure project (the core editing experience Monaco was designed for the Azure Portal first and foremost) and seems to get a lot of love precisely because of its cloud synergies and its place near Azure's heart. It does seem to have captured the hearts and minds of most of Microsoft's best tooling engineers. That said, it's possibly the most "Developers developers developers" they've ever been given how much of that tooling is now cross-platform, isn't tied so much to Windows specifically, and isn't tied as much to Microsoft-only languages either.
- uticus 4y agoInteresting article from last November that touches on the tension between VS and VS Code: https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/08/dotnet_6_vs_2022/ https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/08/dotnet_6_vs_2022/
- JamesBarney 4y agoThat's true. I guess when I think of Microsoft prioritizing Azure over Visual Studio (which I understand) I'm thinking of VS code on the Azure side even though it is a tool.
- schmidp 4y agowe are developing a connected vehicle platform in .net on azure and one dev is using Rider on Ubuntu and is quite happy.