That's a good point. I never thought of this. I assumed that, because Clang+MinGW was newer, it's less stable. That's why I went with GCC+MinGW. I completely fo

That's a good point. I never thought of this. I assumed that, because Clang+MinGW was newer, it's less stable. That's why I went with GCC+MinGW. I completely forgot about the positive corporate influence on Clang.