3 ms·

I don’t understand though, the layoffs affected a third of the company and eng was involved, how could 33% of the workforce be laid off with over half taking lo

I don’t understand though, the layoffs affected a third of the company and eng was involved, how could 33% of the workforce be laid off with over half taking loans lead to single digit people in this situation? Numbers don’t add up imo.

in_cahoots 4y ago
If the company was growing rapidly, then maybe 33% of the workforce hadn’t vested yet?
- berberous 4y ago
  Yeah, if they laid off new folks who started less than a year ago, none of those people would have vested. And in a rapidly growing company, the new hires can be a big portion of the company.
  - umeshunni 4y ago
    And are typically the mostly likely to get laid off.