3 ms·

> 898KB even without compression. Pretty good. gzip'd it's roughly half of that but that particular web server (althttpd) doesn't (yet?) know how to compress o

• motiejus 4y ago
  It makes sense to pre-compress the static assets. Then the server can load the compressed ones directly, without requiring to link to the compressor, and of course pay the price of online compression. I create two extra files for each static file (for some extensions): file file.gz <-- with zopfli file.br <-- with brotli And the web server, depending on the `Accept-Encoding` header, would serve the right file. The wasm module: $ ls -lh fiddle-module.wasm* -rw-r--r-- 1 motiejus motiejus 779K May 26 15:25 fiddle-module.wasm -rw-r--r-- 1 motiejus motiejus 323K May 26 15:25 fiddle-module.wasm.br -rw-r--r-- 1 motiejus motiejus 357K May 26 18:00 fiddle-module.wasm.gz
  • sgbeal 4y ago
    > And the web server, depending on the `Accept-Encoding` header, would serve the right file. This web server (also part of the sqlite family of projects) doesn't yet know how to do that. https://sqlite.org/althttpd https://sqlite.org/althttpd
  • chrismorgan 4y ago
    Interesting comparing the sizes of different compressors. `gzip -9` gets to 374K, whereas you report zopfli taking it down to 357K. And I had at first run `brotli -9`, being fairly confident in my memory that it had more than nine levels, but finding -h mentioning -# as 1–9, and not seeing --best (level 11) at the other end of the output, and that that’s the default (unlike gzip where I think the default is mostly 6), so that -9 actually makes it do a worse job. Sigh.