I think it's more productive not to assume a religious stance on whether compiler has bugs one way or the other. If there is something wrong, better to read the

I think it's more productive not to assume a religious stance on whether compiler has bugs one way or the other. If there is something wrong, better to read the language spec, the ABI spec and the machine code the compiler generated and judge for yourself. People who, given an extensive description of what compiler did and why it's wrong, get back at you with the religious "it's never a compiler bug" just make me not want to talk to them.