5 ms·

Thank you for keeping records, has this been archived to the Internet Archive as well?

• pabs3 4y ago
  https://archive.ph/20211125232529/https://cr.yp.to/export.html https://archive.ph/20211125232529/https://cr.yp.to/export.ht... https://web.archive.org/web/20220427223318/https://cr.yp.to/export.html https://web.archive.org/web/20220427223318/https://cr.yp.to/...
  • hericium 4y ago
    web.archive.org is fine. That .ph link is a tracking infected garbage, requiring JS.
    • pabs3 4y ago
      The .ph link doesn't require JS here. The entire purpose of archive.is/.ph etc is to archive the DOM, so you don't require to view even pages that originally required JS.
      • hericium 4y ago
        Seeing any content from the original site requires JS to click on a page made to look like Cloudflare's with Google's recaptcha. Later there's mail.ru tracking among others. curl this link and tell me that you see any text from the original website.
        • jwilk 4y ago
          With the default curl settings, I get captcha indeed; but when I fake the User-Agent header ("Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0"), it works for me.
          • hericium 4y ago
            Shame that Firefox on Linux is treated this way then. And there's still the matter of tracking scripts which aren't present with the original content.
        • deleted 4y ago
          [deleted]
        • pabs3 4y ago
          I was viewing the archive in Firefox with JS off and saw the text just fine. With curl I get the text of the original website (no CAPTCHA), with the archive.is wrapper layout wrapper stuff, but that is only because I had "-" as the user-agent, with my normal config of not sending the user-agent header, I get a CAPTCHA. Sounds like other user-agents work too.