3 ms·
I would doubt NOAA if it were tasked with evaluating the consequences of the government's actions. NOAA mostly writes about the weather, and most of the time t
by codefreeordie 4y ago
I would doubt NOAA if it were tasked with evaluating the consequences of the government's actions.
NOAA mostly writes about the weather, and most of the time they aren't trying to claim that the government did or did not cause the weather.
If NOAA were to put out a report on, say, the effectiveness of the current ruling party's approach to weather control, then yes I would doubt them too.
- suture 4y agoYou missed entirely the point made. Obviously I was pointing out that your stated reasoning was flawed. Government regularly publishes data and predictions that are trustworthy and useful. Therefore merely disagreeing with this report because it is a government report is sloppy thinking. Also, even saying “government” as if it is a single entity is sloppy thinking. The federal government has areas of expertise and it is better at some things than others. The CBO is generally held in high regard. The White House Budget Office is the one that people tend to discount as being overly partisan regardless of who is in power.