3 ms·
Couldn't the same argument be used for cigarettes? "We shouldn't regulate tobacco companies influence on kids because it's a parent's responsibility to prevent
by fishtoaster 4y ago
Couldn't the same argument be used for cigarettes? "We shouldn't regulate tobacco companies influence on kids because it's a parent's responsibility to prevent that sort of harmful thing"?
I agree that this bill is silly, but "parents are responsible for preventing all harm to children" doesn't seem like a universally applicable argument.
- systemvoltage 4y agoBut then we go on to legalize Marijuana in California.
- pretendscholar 4y ago? With age restrictions like cigarettes and alcohol.
- ipaddr 4y agoYou're regulating chemical compounds with cigarettes. You are regulating patterns of presenting data with social media.
- ellopoppit 4y agoThis would be regulating dopamine within a digital Skinner Box