4 ms·
As someone who used to do academic archaeology, there are plenty of people with both the time, energy, and ideas out there. The main thing that's missing is mon
by AlotOfReading 4y ago
As someone who used to do academic archaeology, there are plenty of people with both the time, energy, and ideas out there. The main thing that's missing is money.
Funding is tight to a degree that I don't think people from the traditional STEM disciplines realize. The average grant size is far lower than the average NSF grant despite much greater fieldwork costs [1]. The financial restrictions mean you're constantly weighing how important it really is to do basic checks like carbon dating, or whether you can afford imagery (vs just using a printout of google maps). I remember being heartbroken at losing a drone because the money spent buying it, and having to camp in fields and eat fish for long periods because I couldn't afford lodging/other food.
[1] https://dougsarchaeology.wordpress.com/2014/03/12/does-the-size-of-your-nsf-grant-request-matter/ https://dougsarchaeology.wordpress.com/2014/03/12/does-the-s...
- treis 4y agoHow reliable are these LIDAR scans? They seem pretty speculative to me and the way they label features doesn't always make sense. Like page 10 of the PDF has a causeway intersecting with a canal and merging. That doesn't seem likely or possible given what I know about canals and roads.