Its hard to think this is a balanced article when the title is: "Microsoft: Why innovate when you can litigate?" Because to be in the position they are in to b

Its hard to think this is a balanced article when the title is: "Microsoft: Why innovate when you can litigate?" Because to be in the position they are in to be able to litigate involves having innovated first. The modern MS is well known for its R&D and innovation. And lastly does anyone expect anything different from MS? they have a solid history of using the courts as a way of dealing with competitors.