There’s a privacy nexus here as well. People seeking private medical advice and services have a shared interest with the general public in their papers and effe

There’s a privacy nexus here as well. People seeking private medical advice and services have a shared interest with the general public in their papers and effects not being searched without a good reason. Unfortunately some of this is difficult to restrict in the face of the third-party doctrine - and I mean the very literal fact that _someone_ can see you going somewhere in public and compile a record of it. In effect you’re restricting _their_ right to free speech if you insist that _they_ can’t talk about what they witnessed in a public space (or a record was created automatically that would suggest that those real-world events occurred). But some might consider a lack of bodily autonomy to be forced speech or action by the government on behalf of an entity that lacks personhood. So maybe the crux of the matter here is “you can’t make me”.