That's just weird. They have about 30k employees, and they cannot reduce employment by 89 heads just by attrition? Why go through the bad press for a 0.3% workf

That's just weird. They have about 30k employees, and they cannot reduce employment by 89 heads just by attrition? Why go through the bad press for a 0.3% workforce reduction. There are perhaps good reason, but on the face of it, this looks weird.