6 ms·

"The mods on subreddits are a problem" An absolutely site-killing problem. If you actually try to pursue specific topics on subreddits, you find they're admini

"The mods on subreddits are a problem" An absolutely site-killing problem. If you actually try to pursue specific topics on subreddits, you find they're administered by a bunch of babies wallowing in their little sandboxes and throwing tantrums for no apparent reason.

Sunspark 4y ago
No election campaigns either, they are all dictators-for-life unless reddit head office decides they need to be involved. This is the same issue IRC has. In the old days, if you were lucky, sometimes you could unseat a tyrant, but modern IRC channel ownership is enforced by the server itself. This is part of why I like Twitter, even though I haven't been active on it in some time. People have to opt-in to you on Twitter. It's impossible to be a tyrant on Twitter, you cannot compel people to pay attention to you there. The disadvantage of Twitter of course is that it's full of bots so you have to put together your own curated lists of people that seem reasonable. I don't even look at the home feed.
- warrenm 4y ago
  > People have to opt-in to you on Twitter. It's impossible to be a tyrant on Twitter, you cannot compel people to pay attention to you there. You can't "compel people to pay attention to you" on Reddit (or HN, Facebook, etc) either Mute/block/ban exists on pretty much every social media platform (with the possible exception of HN (at least - I've never seen it hereon))
  - Sunspark 4y ago
    The way reddit implemented the block is very interesting also. If you wish to control a conversation in some sort of strange manner, all you need to do is state something outrageous and plainly wrong, and then block the other person arguing with you. It makes you look like you got the last word because they can't respond and your comment stays up.
    - warrenm 4y ago
      It's kinda similar to Facebook - I block Joe Schmoe, but people who haven't blocked him (or me) can still see whatever it is he wrote

Sunspark 4y ago

No election campaigns either, they are all dictators-for-life unless reddit head office decides they need to be involved. This is the same issue IRC has. In the old days, if you were lucky, sometimes you could unseat a tyrant, but modern IRC channel ownership is enforced by the server itself. This is part of why I like Twitter, even though I haven't been active on it in some time. People have to opt-in to you on Twitter. It's impossible to be a tyrant on Twitter, you cannot compel people to pay attention to you there. The disadvantage of Twitter of course is that it's full of bots so you have to put together your own curated lists of people that seem reasonable. I don't even look at the home feed.

warrenm 4y ago
> People have to opt-in to you on Twitter. It's impossible to be a tyrant on Twitter, you cannot compel people to pay attention to you there. You can't "compel people to pay attention to you" on Reddit (or HN, Facebook, etc) either Mute/block/ban exists on pretty much every social media platform (with the possible exception of HN (at least - I've never seen it hereon))
- Sunspark 4y ago
  The way reddit implemented the block is very interesting also. If you wish to control a conversation in some sort of strange manner, all you need to do is state something outrageous and plainly wrong, and then block the other person arguing with you. It makes you look like you got the last word because they can't respond and your comment stays up.
  - warrenm 4y ago
    It's kinda similar to Facebook - I block Joe Schmoe, but people who haven't blocked him (or me) can still see whatever it is he wrote