3 ms·
Here's a link: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2644.pdf http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2644.pdf After a bit of reading, though, it seems I'm wrong. If this study
by randallsquared 15y ago
Here's a link: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2644.pdf http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2644.pdf
After a bit of reading, though, it seems I'm wrong. If this study is to be believed, employment rates around 1900 were quite chaotic.
- protomyth 15y agoWow, they are going through some serious gyrations to figure out the rates. You're right, that is some serious chaos. If I get their figures right (kinda hard), it seems like the number of jobs available is greater now than in 1900, but that might take a while more to verify. nice find.