Most important part, IMHO: > Barraza's filing also said Tesla's arbitration provision is unfair because it has a carve-out that lets Tesla sue employees for "i

Most important part, IMHO: > Barraza's filing also said Tesla's arbitration provision is unfair because it has a carve-out that lets Tesla sue employees for "intellectual property, confidentiality, and anti-competition claims." Multiple courts "have held that a one-sided carve-out from arbitration for the employer's claims, as in Tesla's arbitration provision here, is unconscionable," the filing said. > Kaus agreed, finding that "Tesla has reserved its right to go to court for the claims it is likely to have and has relegated Barraza to arbitration for her likely claims," and that "the agreement is substantively unconscionable for lack of mutuality."