4 ms·
I wonder what the best way is to strike a balance between calling an entire organization as having 'toxic culture' to highlighting the obvious egregious violati
by passivate 4y ago
I wonder what the best way is to strike a balance between calling an entire organization as having 'toxic culture' to highlighting the obvious egregious violations that we all want to eliminate. Like, can we call out America as having 'toxic culture' since we literally voted a sexual predator into office? At-least the employees at a company didn't vote on their leaders.
- troon-lover 4y ago
- goldenchrome 4y agoWe’ve voted lots of sexual predators into office. Lyndon Johnson’s nickname for his penis was “jumbo”. Ben Franklin’s diplomatic strategy was to seduce his opponents wives so they would convince their husbands for him. Everyone knows about JFK and Clinton. And so on.
- lupire 4y agoBen Franklin was not a sexual predator in your scenario. Consent matters.
- goldenchrome 4y agoIt’s not exactly a sterling example of ethics.
- Zenbit_UX 4y agoThat's not what's being discussed. Your projections on morality - thankfully - do not make someone a sexual predator.
- dokem 4y agoWithout knowing more details, none of that behavior seems predatory. Debaucherous and with ulterior motive, maybe, but so? I don't think being bold and pursuing women should be demonized.
- passivate 4y agoMy point was not political, but just that overly broad use of words dilutes their effects.
- cyanydeez 4y agoThey had a word for people who weren't officers in Germany, but did nothing to stop the violence? Nazis, they were all Nazis. Seriously dog, an organization is not some organic disconnected and siloed creature, it's all together in playing the song.
- passivate 4y agoI have friends that work at these companies and they're not toxic. Its like saying US citizens should renounce their citizenship and move to another country because of the warcrimes of the US that they didn't stop.