3 ms·
> It’s not that there’s low (or no) demand, it’s that people are not being recorded as having voiced this concern. It’s worse than that. People _complain about
by jrmg 4y ago
> It’s not that there’s low (or no) demand, it’s that people are not being recorded as having voiced this concern.
It’s worse than that. People _complain about it being on_. Look at any forums about home network or WiFi troubleshooting and switching it off on your router will often be in the ‘first, do this’ sort of answers.
Even here this often comes up. The sentiment is ‘IPv4 has to work reliably because so many people don’t have IPv6 and things need to work for them. You’re only asking for trouble by also having IPv6’. As a practical matter it’s hard to argue with, but it’s not a way to make progress…
- SSLy 4y agoThat's because quite often ipv6 is either badly implemented, or once you have it on, it changes ipv4 to CGNAT mode (hello, Liberty Media)