> Iceland has non-proportional representation for a rather obvious reason. Over 51% of people who live in Iceland live in the capital region. A proportional rep

> Iceland has non-proportional representation for a rather obvious reason. Over 51% of people who live in Iceland live in the capital region. A proportional representation democracy would be identical to a dictatorship. But Iceland has proportional representation. I wonder whether you mean that it doesn't have at-large proportional representation (i.e. only one district). If so, I tend to agree that merging all of the districts would be a backwards step. Having said that, I still believe it would be far from a dictatorship.