5 ms·
> Nowadays, he couldn't do the research work he did there and at other places at any big IT company - it's R&D, with the emphasis on "D". I, on the other hand,
by IMTDb 4y ago
> Nowadays, he couldn't do the research work he did there and at other places at any big IT company - it's R&D, with the emphasis on "D".
I, on the other hand, am amazed by the progress being done today, and the research paper released on an almost weekly basis by companies like Google, Microsoft and co. Just look at the language and image models that are released, the progress on computer vision etc.
I played with the playground of OpenAI GPT-3 and I am blown away at the result. It's not perfect, but it's orders of magnitude better than what we had easily access to just few month ago. I have started using it in my day-to-day life on some specific tasks, and I can't wait to see the next versions. I can't even start to fathom the amazing products people are going to build around it in the next decade.
It's absolutely true that these models/research serve the purpose of the company building them... but even Leslie says in the video that he did his entire career in the industry because that's where he saw many interesting challenges, and that his whole research was a means to an end.
R&D is still alive and kicking, and is going faster than ever. You might just be looking at the past with rose tainted glasses, and needlessly undermining the present.
- vfclists 4y agoAI and ML are not true computer science because no one knows how these models work, not even the developers
- ryanklee 4y agoWhy does epistemic purity matter? The results are astounding.
- mirker 4y agoPeople knew how AI worked when AI meant “graph search.” But now solving chess is not AI and linear (and nonlinear) regression is…
- OkayPhysicist 4y agoThe problem is the usage of the label 'AI'. There are basically 4 uses of the the label: 'General AI' (popular among layfolk), 'stuff computers can't do yet' (popular among developers), 'stuff we just figured out how to do' (popular among sales people), and '2nd order solutions' (popular among academics).
- anthk 4y agoMathematicians do. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probabilistic_reasoning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probabilistic_reasoning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzy_logic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzy_logic