4 ms·
Hetzner is pretty similar in its cloud offerings, but it's also not uncommon on HN.
by Sebb767 4y ago
Hetzner is pretty similar in its cloud offerings, but it's also not uncommon on HN.
- jacooper 4y agoAnd is way way cheaper, but still not very coludy, they still don't have object storage, and their resource limits are lower than others
- mekster 4y agoThey have storage box, which allows for SFTP and other more familiar and easier to use protocols than S3 and very cheap except they only provide European region. Their cloud servers are very cheap (like half the cost of other low cost competitors) but again, very limited regional presence outside Europe. At least they added US region lately.
- jacooper 4y agoStorage box is pretty good, however its not a s redundant as most other object storage providers. Its basically protect by one single raid cluster. I'm really looking forwards to Mega's S4 offering, it very compatitvely priced and is encrypted, and it looks like of have the same kind of data protection as normal mega services.
- tmikaeld 4y agoObject Storage is high on their roadmap, says an internal source.
- codeflo 4y agoAny guess why Hetzner Cloud isn't visibly moving towards offering more managed services in general (the kind of stuff Digital Ocean offers, like databases, Kubernetes etc.)?
- tmikaeld 4y agoTheir key business is dedicated servers, even their Cloud is IO limited (1-2K on 4K) in ways that will force any growing business on their cloud to move to dedicated eventually (Even their "dedicated CPU" instances have a cap of 5K IOPS).