> Thanks. You're welcome. I don't look at usernames on HN so it didn't occur to me until now that it's your project. It really does seem like a well-considere

> Thanks. You're welcome. I don't look at usernames on HN so it didn't occur to me until now that it's your project. It really does seem like a well-considered extension of Oberon, I'm going to check it out in more depth later. > The argument was, that Wirth's original language designs were less successful than the extended versions designed by others, e.g. Boarland. In a sense, the extensions of his work are the success, eh? > The original designs are undoubtedly sufficiently expressive to build things of decent size, but apparently too little attractive for wide adoption. In the quote from the interview with Wirth he says "I think the industry thinks it’s a big asset to have a complex thing that increases their reputation of being sophisticated." So rather than a curing a lack of expressivity, complexity instead provides a marketing edge, in his opinion. > Not surprisingly, variants of all Wirth languages have quickly emerged Again, to me that seems like a kind of success. The alternatives are that Wirth birthed perfect languages, like Athena springing from the head of Zeus, or that they were all barren and died on the vine.