The best rebuttal to this is the following quote from the article in question, which shows that not only is Tether NOT fully backed by cash, a lot of their supp

The best rebuttal to this is the following quote from the article in question, which shows that not only is Tether NOT fully backed by cash, a lot of their supposed collateral sounds quite shady and they are also not letting anyone else audit what they are doing: "Regulators and economists have long questioned whether Tether has enough assets in its reserves to justify its stablecoin’s purported peg to the dollar. “USDT is, quite simply, fully backed by collateral,” Tether said in a statement Monday. “It has maintained its peg because every USDT is redeemable for dollars via Tether, and as such any time the price goes below $1 investors can earn a profit by buying USDT for a discount and redeeming it with Tether.” The company previously claimed tether was backed one-to-one by dollars in a bank account, but subsequently revealed it was using other assets including commercial paper — short-term corporate debt — and even digital tokens as collateral after a settlement with the New York attorney general. Last week, Tether said it reduced the amount of commercial paper it owns and increased its holdings of U.S. Treasury bills. For the first time, the British Virgin Islands-based firm said it also holds some foreign government debt. Tether declined to comment further on the source of its funds, but said it is pursuing a more thorough audit of its reserves."