Are we reading the same article? He has an ordered, referenced critique that explains exactly why java's fork/join doesn't belong in the JDK. I don't think it

Are we reading the same article? He has an ordered, referenced critique that explains exactly why java's fork/join doesn't belong in the JDK. I don't think it's really appropriate to call this a conflict of interest; industry professionals do this all the time. Java should be under special scrutiny from the smartest people we have, now that it's owned by Oracle. I don't know where you get the impression that this is badly written, but in my opinion this outshines much of the writing we see on HN.