3 ms·
It's not a particularly well argued piece. As an example, It's nitpicking numbers without showing how that nit picking fundamentally changes the argument. Lik
by treis 4y ago
It's not a particularly well argued piece. As an example, It's nitpicking numbers without showing how that nit picking fundamentally changes the argument. Like they point out that the EU Commission says 1/5 kids will be abused while the WHO says 1/10. But 1/10 is still an incredibly high number. So even if 1/5 is wrong and 1/10 is right nothing fundamentally changes.
- pnt12 4y agoThat number establishes the need for the proposal. If the number is wrong, the premise of the proposal becomes even more lacking. I'd also argue that maybe child abuse in Europe is below the global average, so we may be talking about orders of magnitude wrong, not just slightly.