4 ms·
Ed Feser is a known lunatic. You only need to look up his comments on same sex marriage for evidence. That doesn’t necessarily mean he’s a lunatic about phys
by huitzitziltzin 4y ago
Ed Feser is a known lunatic. You only need to look up his comments on same sex marriage for evidence. That doesn’t necessarily mean he’s a lunatic about physics but I’d be hesitant before investing a lot of time in him.
There are lots of good philosophers of physics who are not (to my knowledge) lunatics: David Albert, David Malament, Marc Lange are three. Sean Carroll is a physicist with philosophical interests. There are better sources than this one.
- mellosouls 4y agoEd Feser is a known lunatic. You only need to look up his comments on same sex marriage for evidence. It says on his bio he writes from a conservative viewpoint and he is a Roman Catholic. I had a quick google and although I could find articles by him on the subject representing those viewpoints and being critical or opposed, I couldn't immediately find "lunatic" arguments. Perhaps you could point us to them?