It's obvious to anyone that mass surveillance is not against crime BUT to commit larger crimes, like dictatorship and oppression, like homogenization of humans

It's obvious to anyone that mass surveillance is not against crime BUT to commit larger crimes, like dictatorship and oppression, like homogenization of humans destroying the mechanism keep us evolving etc. The point is: how many, understood that, decide that's about time to say STOP, pretending immediate arrest and trial for crimes against humanity, attempted coup, high treason, embezzlement etc to our formal politicians and their private-sector shoulder? For what I see very few. At that point, missing Citizens, we can't have Democracy, so at that point it's perfectly legit morally consider certain level of ignorance like a sort of soft-crime and so pushing toward a new neofeudal society where the cohort of Citizens abuse the crowd of subjects, like our oppressors do, for Citizens interests. Of course it's not easy, but that's is.