2 ms·
Until eventually someone invariable has to clean up your mess due to awful choices. But why should you care? You've moved on with your trail of collateral dam
by 77pt77 4y ago
Until eventually someone invariable has to clean up your mess due to awful choices.
But why should you care?
You've moved on with your trail of collateral damage by then, reaped the benefits and the fixer will subconsciously take the blame for any problems from outside observers.
- anon_123g987 4y agoA.k.a. "Move fast and break things".
- yourapostasy 4y agoDon’t know why you’re being downvoted, but this agency effect is real. The implicit assumption that rarely works out behind this “git ‘er done” is the “small” tasks picked up have already been organized into such tasks from a decomposition of the complex problem the tasks are part of. This is why for example, I see fancy CICD pipelines covering for static component dependencies locked into a hard coded version of components. Completely breaking a core value proposition of the pipeline, but someone got the story points and moved on. It turns out that small task of putting the project into the pipeline should have been decomposed further. Oops. This philosophy is a power tool and like any such tool, you take care in where you point it, and it will serve you well. Point it in the wrong direction however, and it will also happily blindly eviscerate you with no malice.