4 ms·
I believe her broader point, but I don't really connect the dots from "diversity in a founding team is bad" to "women shouldn't start companies with men." Igno
by jfarmer 15y ago
I believe her broader point, but I don't really connect the dots from "diversity in a founding team is bad" to "women shouldn't start companies with men."
Ignore the gender issue for now. Having homogeneous founding team is valuable because it reduces time-wasting arguments. That's really what it boils down to -- I don't think it has anything to do with men vs. women.
A startup could just as easily be founded by two women with shared backgrounds and values, e.g., RentTheRunway, BirchBox, One Kings Lane, etc.
Gilt's founding team included both men and women. Sugar, Inc's founding team included four men and two women.
Homogeneity in values, diversity in skills is what's valuable for a founding team.
- dolphenstein 15y agoHomogeneous founding teams also bring no new novel insight to the problem at hand. I'd think time wasting arguments aren't a symptom of diversity, rather it's a quality of pig headed dogmatists. Diversity + open mindedness is the way to go!
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]