https://i0.wp.com/www.tuckstruck.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Ping-Plot-in-Motion.png?w=1711&ssl=1 https://i0.wp.com/www.tuckstruck.net/wp-content/uploads/202

https://i0.wp.com/www.tuckstruck.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Ping-Plot-in-Motion.png?w=1711&ssl=1 https://i0.wp.com/www.tuckstruck.net/wp-content/uploads/2022... Actual recordings in motion of normal end-user terminal in motion. It works OK-ish. But a lot of packet loss (completely lost packets) and latency spikes (from retransmits). Of course, with ground hardware built for in-motion, you could do significantly better. Source: https://www.tuckstruck.net/truck-and-kit/geekery/starlink-mobile-roaming/ https://www.tuckstruck.net/truck-and-kit/geekery/starlink-mo... I'm guessing utilization is rather high with retransmits, etc-- which is probably a driving factor of Starlink prohibiting in-motion use in EULA. Note it's not really the speed that matters. It's suddenly having a much different bearing to the satellite because you have begun a turn or hit a dip in the road that matters.