3 ms·
Luckily we've been studying mRNA vaccines for over 50 years, which gave us a very good understanding of the long-term effects. What we really needed to test for
by arcticbull 4y ago
Luckily we've been studying mRNA vaccines for over 50 years, which gave us a very good understanding of the long-term effects. What we really needed to test for was short-term effects + efficacy. These are easy to determine when 1% of the population is infected at the time of your clinical trial.
I can't stress how much the COVID mRNA deployment wasn't a "#yolo" moment like some folks still continue to insist.
It was a product of years and years of meticulous research and development. This put us at the finish line, and all we had to do was get over it.
We also got the J&J vaccine out in basically the same amount of time - because like the mRNA vaccines, the adenoviral vector vaccine platform had about 50 years of research and development behind it.
To use your analogy, we started with 10 ladies each 8 months pregnant, and we got them over the line in a month.
That doesn't mean the pregnancy took a month - just that we had a head start.
- SV_BubbleTime 4y agoHow many times did mRNA vaccines pass phase three trials in those 50 years? > We also got the J&J vaccine out in basically the same amount of time No skin off my back, but is that an example you want to use?
- ch4s3 4y agoNot to be overly pedantic, but having the idea in the 1970s didn't count for much, because no one could get mRNA into human cells until around 1987. The first attempt at a vaccine was around maybe 1993. I mean, directionally your right but saying "we've been studying mRNA vaccines for over 50 years" isn't really correct.