3 ms·

This is like a casino offering to let you leave with 10% of your winnings because their dealer didn't shuffle the deck. Not an reasonable expectation. I will g

This is like a casino offering to let you leave with 10% of your winnings because their dealer didn't shuffle the deck. Not an reasonable expectation. I will go back to this idea of an endogenous logic calculation vs. exogenous parsing errors description, where so long as he did not misrepresent the identities or sabotage the functions of any of the sources or destinations of the funds he used in his system, he should be in the clear. It would be interesting to verify whether his technique had this "functional purity," that I've named and am balancing my argument on tho.

aidenn0 4y ago
> This is like a casino offering to let you leave with 10% of your winnings because their dealer didn't shuffle the deck. Not an reasonable expectation. If the casino has Mafia backing, then maybe it is reasonable...
aidenn0 4y ago
Probably nobody is reading this thread anymore, but I remembered an analogous situation in a casino with a slot machine (it credited $1 inserted as $10) and the people who kept playing it for that reason were potentially liable for fraud. https://www.techdirt.com/2007/07/24/criminal-charges-for-using-a-slot-machine-with-faulty-software/ https://www.techdirt.com/2007/07/24/criminal-charges-for-usi...