4 ms·
You are making inferences with what was done with the data. We all know that both sides used data nefariously to try to win the most powerful post in the world
by ipspam 4y ago
You are making inferences with what was done with the data.
We all know that both sides used data nefariously to try to win the most powerful post in the world.
One side won and got praised, one side won and got shit on.
It's total bias.
Now let's do the 2020 DNC voter role takeover, harassment of voters, curing ballots, and general fraudulent "get out the vote" campaign that illegally targeted only heavy democratic areas.
Lol. You see? It's all a joke.
- Maursault 4y ago> the most powerful post in the world. Technically, US Federal Prosecutors are more powerful than the US President. While the President appoints them, and while there is long-standing internal policy not to, a prosecutor legally can call a Grand Jury and indict the President. The power there really is the ability to seat the Grand Jury at will, which any US Attorney can direct to indict even a ham sandwich.[1] [1] NY State Chief Judge Sol Wachtler, 1985
- ipspam 4y agoNo. They aren't. Federal prosecutors don't talk to world leaders, don't make public policy, don't tell their party of hundreds of members of Congress what to do, don't apportion funding, don't go to war, negotiate peace treaties, task the CIA with unsavoury task, etc, etc, etc. All a prosecutor can do is take out one man. And even that isn't really allowed. It has to be properly predicated, and the person has to be guilty. Supposedly. A president has few constraints on power, mostly senate/Congress, some courts. Whereas a prosecutor must err on the side of caution and be able to win a conviction, a President can err on the side of whatever he wants, and if something is deemed illegal by the courts, oh well, rewrite the law.