5 ms·
Rolling this into Google Docs seems like a nobrainer.
by tpmx 4y ago
Rolling this into Google Docs seems like a nobrainer.
- curiousgal 4y agoUntil they pull of the plug on it.
- semicolon_storm 4y agoOr rolling this into Google Image Search to create images that match users' search queries on the fly. Don't like any of the results from the real web? Well how about these we created just for you.
- riffraff 4y agoAh yes, deepfakes porn as a service would have been a blessing for teenage me.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- ma2rten 4y agoGoogle is very conservative about anything that can generate open-ended outputs. Also these models are still very expensive computationally.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- londons_explore 4y agoThey're expensive to train, but not awfully expensive to use. Especially if you have hundreds of images you want to generate (due to the way compute devices tend to get much more efficiency with a large batch size). Google could totally afford it, especially if the feature was hidden behind a button the user had to click, and not just run for every image search.
- tpmx 4y agoThe input control is pretty hard - it kinda needs an AGI :). How do you stop undesirable images being created?
- londons_explore 4y agoIf I were running Google, I would release it with a disclaimer, and not do anything technical to prevent undesirable images being created. How does Adobe prevent Photoshop being used to draw offensive images? They don't... People understand that a tool can be used for good and bad.
- zone411 4y agoWhen diffusion models are used, the inference time could be meaningful. But then this is only 64x64 with upsampling, so probably not too bad.