4 ms·
I mean, you were being a bit condescending? You're also quite wrong, in that you define "friendship" in a very strict way that doesn't comport with how other pe
by mrtranscendence 4y ago
I mean, you were being a bit condescending? You're also quite wrong, in that you define "friendship" in a very strict way that doesn't comport with how other people use the term. It's quite possible to have friends that aren't close friends; people whom you have fun with, whose lives you would prefer to be able to know something about, but whom you wouldn't go out of your way to keep up with if it became inconvenient. These people still count as friends.
To put it another way, I have family I would lose touch with if I left Facebook. They're still family and I would still prefer to know if they graduated college or got cancer or died. Same with friends-who-aren't-close.
- nobody9999 4y ago>I mean, you were being a bit condescending? You're also quite wrong, in that you define "friendship" in a very strict way that doesn't comport with how I use the term. If we're diving to /. depth here (as you seem to want to do), I'll go with it. There (see above). FTFY.
- mrtranscendence 4y agoI’ll be honest, I’m not sure what you mean about “/. depth”, but fair enough.
- nobody9999 4y ago>I’ll be honest, I’m not sure what you mean about “/. depth”, but fair enough. /. == slashdot.org noted in the last decade for shallow discussion, infighting and poor quality discourse. Hence the "FTFY." Not attempting to continue our disagreement, just clarifying my earlier post. Have a good day!