Can they make a strong case about what their intent was? Do they have some legal agreement with the hacker that the judge can use to divine their intent and t

Can they make a strong case about what their intent was? Do they have some legal agreement with the hacker that the judge can use to divine their intent and the hacker's violation of it beyond reasonable doubt? Or might the hacker and his clever lawyers have an equally strong case that whatever the code allowed was the "true" intent, that the code is the ultimate arbiter of intent, regardless what Index might have said otherwise? I kind of hope it does go to court, will be interesting to see what the opposing legal teams come up with.