3 ms·
> Part of the problem is that there's no clear line. This is what baffles/wonders me about the state of the art in building companies. It seems so anecdotal an
by dcow 4y ago
> Part of the problem is that there's no clear line.
This is what baffles/wonders me about the state of the art in building companies. It seems so anecdotal and ad-hoc. Case studies and good advice, while they exist, are from "previous generations" and "we do it differently" because "culture". It feels like society has to continuously reinvent solutions to managing people and projects rather than building upon proven and effective strategies. I guess, perhaps, I am betraying my own lack of knowledge of this domain. Maybe there are tried and true tactics and I've just never experienced them. Related, it really feels like there should be a sub-field of "sociology" set on improving the efficiency of groups of humans using objective methodology that yields consistent and reliable results...
- sumanthvepa 4y ago> it feels like there should be a sub-field of “sociology” set on improving the efficiency groups of humans Yes there is. Its called organisational behaviour. Most b-schools have some faculty specialising in it. Cornell,I think, has a whole department in the school of Industrial and Labor Relations. They’re pretty good.
- danielmarkbruce 4y agoLook at any field which has a lot of moving parts - economics, social sciences, management, nutrition and so on. None of them have good theory. It's probably not possible.