4 ms·
The problem is the OP's claim of "legal extremism" is (apparently) founded in the Family Research Council's definition of "extreme" which is... Extreme. It'd
by riskable 4y ago
The problem is the OP's claim of "legal extremism" is (apparently) founded in the Family Research Council's definition of "extreme" which is... Extreme. It'd be like a Confederate citing the reason for the Civil War as the North's "extreme" laws regarding slavery.
- MockObject 4y agoThat analogy would hold if the North's anti-slavery position were held by a tiny minority of countries, if I'm understanding your argument.
- josephcsible 4y agoThis argument works both ways: Believing that the FRC is a hate group just because the SPLC says so is like believing the Union is a hate group just because the Confederacy says so.