3 ms·
The same place as the rest of the money: misc investments that are now worth a lot less than a few weeks ago. Or did you think that cash was sitting in some ban
by jillesvangurp 4y ago
The same place as the rest of the money: misc investments that are now worth a lot less than a few weeks ago. Or did you think that cash was sitting in some bank account happily inflating month on month? To make that cash available, they'd have to sell shares, bonds, options, etc. that that money is currently invested in at a loss. The better strategy is to wait for a recovery. That might take some time. Selling at a loss to make risky investments in startups is not a good plan.
The even better strategy is to invest whatever cash there is into those things more likely to recover quickly rather than sketchy startups as there are likely quite a few undervalued things in the market that could recover by a sweet 10-20% in the next month.
And since that money technically belongs not to the investors but rather conservative entities they represent (like pension funds) they are going to have to do conservative things in times like this. Hence the temporary lack of liquidity for startups.
- yowlingcat 4y agoThat's not how the funds flow works. The capital call structure was baked into the GP's raise from the LP -- if that happens at ATH and is highly beneficial to the GP, then the LP has a contractual obligation to adhere to that structure. As sibling comments have mentioned, of course, whether the GP exercises that contractual right is far more complex and based on the relationship to the LP; and indeed, VC is a relationship driven game, so the natural behavior on part of the GP is to take their time, see how things shake out, use leverage to get better deals and take a wait and see approach. The point is, though, if a VC chose /not/ to take a wait and see approach and instead go out guns blazing to take advantage of a buyer's market -- they would be within their rights to do that.