3 ms·
You don't seem to understand the history of the time. There are two names on the report. There was very little, if any, political support at that time for giv
by dev_tty01 4y ago
You don't seem to understand the history of the time. There are two names on the report. There was very little, if any, political support at that time for giving her "extra" credit. The more likely scenario is that she should have been first author. That sort of thing happened a lot.
- causi 4y agoI believe they meant misattributed in modern media, not while she was working.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- HL33tibCe7 4y agoYou’re right, I was thinking of a different case. Should have read the article before commenting