“The constitution does not explicitly use the term privacy but does refer to related concepts from which one can infer some logic about what kinds of privacy ar

“The constitution does not explicitly use the term privacy but does refer to related concepts from which one can infer some logic about what kinds of privacy are protected vs not” is a reasonable interpretation in context … and coincidentally, exactly what the author is arguing, once you get beyond the quoted part. I think this whole subthread is being too hard on a snippet.