4 ms·
Yes... And people keep bashing at the Safari team for holding the web development back. I mean, it's clear that the Safari team also has their own agenda, regar
by satao 4y ago
Yes... And people keep bashing at the Safari team for holding the web development back. I mean, it's clear that the Safari team also has their own agenda, regarding competition with the App Store. But the stuff that Google is pushing is just more ways for them to track you in the end.
- mmis1000 4y agoThe things safari lack isn't even relevant to privacy. They are more about buggy layout (not the shiny grid layout or style worker, it doesn't even works correctly with css2 a lot of time), incorrectly implemented API (not the 'not implemented due to privacy' one, they are those implemented but reporting wrong result). Firefox also rejects a lot of proposal due to security reasons. But for every one it supported, it works correctly. Instead of work in funny way and require devs to guess the browser and insert ransom workaround just to make it not using the improper result safari gives and breaking the page. Fun fact: Safari doesn't even handle the full ISO8601 correctly until very recent version. A timestamp without timezone will be parsed into incorrect timezone. A timestamp without colon in the middle of timezone don't even be parsed(which is unfortunately go's default output format).
- codedokode 4y agoRegarding timezones, this seems to be a fault of ISO standard. Why do they allow several representations of the same thing?