I simply addressed each of the points using basic observations. I'm approaching this in a good faith as per HN guidelines. It doesn't take hours of reading aca

I simply addressed each of the points using basic observations. I'm approaching this in a good faith as per HN guidelines. It doesn't take hours of reading academic/white papers or hours of research to evaluate this at a surface level. (And if it does, why on earth would I trust it over traditional methods I can understand?) If someone was trying to say a pile of dog poo was a great solution to the problems described, I'd say have the same response (granted a shorted one.) If you want to people to actually use and understand and use this technology, then you gotta take some actions towards that. If you can't actually "sell" a fix to an actual problem using these objective facts, then maybe you should go back to the drawing board and come up with a better idea. Or I guess just stay on your bubble and stew about it if that's what you want.