4 ms·
Sure, CO2 removal is much less efficient than point-capture, but if we're talking about using excess power generated at wind and solar installations, we may as
by sdenton4 4y ago
Sure, CO2 removal is much less efficient than point-capture, but if we're talking about using excess power generated at wind and solar installations, we may as well, right?
...Of course, this isn't what you meant. But there will always be better ways to use 'excess' energy than bitcoin's proof-of-access-to-energy-arbitrage scheme.
- PaulHoule 4y agoAlso doesn't the Bitcoin network run all the time? Maybe it can average spatially but it can't decide to simplify the problem because less power is available globally.
- Andrew_nenakhov 4y agoIt would absolutely average globally at the current scale.