3 ms·
I don't think scale is really the problem here. If so it is the scale of health care costs primarily. Since those tend to explode easily, workers are expected t
by raxxorraxor 4y ago
I don't think scale is really the problem here. If so it is the scale of health care costs primarily. Since those tend to explode easily, workers are expected to document every little step they take. And if a nurse spends 10 minutes to console somebody, she is in need to justify that time towards her superiors, who in turn need to justify the cost of health care to insurers, who in turn need to justify their expenses to patients or government. It is a self-reinforcing circle of hell and fully behaves that way because wrong decisions are taken at multiple steps. It isn't even that complicated, just short sighted incentives that fail to get a system under control.
The case for Google is another one. The incentives of the company slowly changed as it moved onto the path many corporations took before. It isn't a necessity, but the drive to growth put them there where they are today. They wanted money, the problems of software logistics were already solved when they were a smaller company. In fact only when they were successful more and more people wanted an in on the profit.
Of course problems are often more complicated in detail, but I don't think too many people looking at the larger picture are really the problem.
> Naive ideological purity
That is just a rant, I don't think there is any evidence of that happening anywhere.
- menacingly 4y agoCertainly the entire thing is a rant, but my point is not to criticize the naïveté, it’s to sympathize with it. Unfortunately, you win the election, you run the social network, your revolution is successful, and you come face to face with the actual challenges your predecessors faced. This is the source of our continued frustration with elections doing nothing. Without a theoretical leap in solving problems at scale, there is little to be done, and the variances between solutions are just fiddling with coefficients. It’s easy to think that some shadowy league of dentists is preventing a cavity cure from reaching the market, or that the forces of for-profit healthcare are arrayed together in an alleyway. We love to think that a very large series of people have just not had the balls to stand up to our favorite caricature of an enemy, but the truth is usually nuanced, complex, and slow. The asterisk at the end of simple solutions is usually “provided everyone agrees with me or bends to my will” We’d likely both chew our own leg off to escape the meeting to eliminate this billing line item, both blaming it on some complexity upstream we can’t agree on.