4 ms·
"That sounds objectively much worse than what we have now." I love the nft haters who think they're sounding smart but sound like absolute morons to anyone who
by kobasa 4y ago
"That sounds objectively much worse than what we have now."
I love the nft haters who think they're sounding smart but sound like absolute morons to anyone who's done at least a few hours of oBjEcTiVe research into the space. And normally I'd take the time to educate but with attitude like this and a made up mind, nah hfsp.
- spicybright 4y agoI simply addressed each of the points using basic observations. I'm approaching this in a good faith as per HN guidelines. It doesn't take hours of reading academic/white papers or hours of research to evaluate this at a surface level. (And if it does, why on earth would I trust it over traditional methods I can understand?) If someone was trying to say a pile of dog poo was a great solution to the problems described, I'd say have the same response (granted a shorted one.) If you want to people to actually use and understand and use this technology, then you gotta take some actions towards that. If you can't actually "sell" a fix to an actual problem using these objective facts, then maybe you should go back to the drawing board and come up with a better idea. Or I guess just stay on your bubble and stew about it if that's what you want.