Very misleading, English doesn't have diacritics but it has copious amounts of digraphs like ch, sh, tch, eu, oe, oo etc... All of which may represent a differe

Very misleading, English doesn't have diacritics but it has copious amounts of digraphs like ch, sh, tch, eu, oe, oo etc... All of which may represent a different sound (being a Germanic language, English has a huge variety of vowels). Some Latin-based alphabets such as Turkish and Eastern European specifically attempted to solve this problem (e.g. use [Ç] instead of [ch] in Turkish or [Š] instead of [sh] in Czech et al). You may not consider digraph usage a problem, but historically, for some reason, many alphabet designers went this route. So, from this perspective it doesn't hold true English seems the most suitable for Latin alphabet. I think quite the opposite, Latin alphabet completely lacks the resources English needs to present its vowels consistently.