3 ms·
The fact that there's plenty to do does not mean the ratio effort/impact on the environment is worth it. Switching to a plant based diet is almost equivalent t
by Majestic121 4y ago
The fact that there's plenty to do does not mean the ratio effort/impact on the environment is worth it.
Switching to a plant based diet is almost equivalent to eating half as much of an omnivorous diet : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-06466-8 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-06466-8
However, dividing omnivorous food intake by two would probably not be possible in the long term, unless your diet is way oversized.
And it's easier to switch to a plant based diet than to be constantly hungry.
Reducing environmental impact is a marathon, not a sprint : it s much better to take actions that can be sustained in the long term than very impressive actions that are marginally more effective, but abandoned after 2 month
- endisneigh 4y agono one is talking about being hungry. I'm talking about reducing food waste and eating less in light of the massive obesity endemic. eating plant based can be a part of that, sure, but isn't directly related to my point.
- goodpoint 4y ago> Switching to a plant based diet is almost equivalent to eating half as much of an omnivorous diet : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-06466-8 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-06466-8 The improvement is way bigger than that for most meat-intensive (e.g. American) diets. See https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food