3 ms·
I have 1 second to spare. Optimization is good, but shaving milliseconds at all costs always sounded a bit pointless to me, except for real-time audio communica
by john-doe 4y ago
I have 1 second to spare. Optimization is good, but shaving milliseconds at all costs always sounded a bit pointless to me, except for real-time audio communication.
- Jamie9912 4y agoDo you have 5 seconds to spare? 10 seconds to spare?
- john-doe 4y agoIf the content is worth accessing, certainly :)
- klibertp 4y agoThe question is more how often rather than how long. For example, this page: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/elisp.html https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/elisp.ht... takes nearly 15 seconds to fully load for me, but then I can live for literally weeks without having to refresh it (ie. other than on sporadic Firefox restart). That's quite obviously different in the 1/10-of-chapter-per-page style of docs that Rust books seem to like.