3 ms·
I don't think he would've been suspended if he would've just critized climate change alarmism. But when he dismisses the risk altogether by saying that Miami w
by armada651 4y ago
I don't think he would've been suspended if he would've just critized climate change alarmism.
But when he dismisses the risk altogether by saying that Miami will cope with it? That's simply a deliberate misrepresentation of the facts and you're not allowed to do that when talking to investors.
- blitzar 4y ago> by saying that Miami will cope with it? That's simply a deliberate misrepresentation of the facts Are you suggesting that Miami can not cope with the pending climate crisis that will see it cease to exist and be underwater by 2025 [1] I am willing to wager that Miami will continue to exist on 1st January 2026. [1] https://miami.cbslocal.com/2015/10/14/predictions-put-south-florida-under-water-by-2025/ https://miami.cbslocal.com/2015/10/14/predictions-put-south-...
- armada651 4y agoI am not suggesting that, 2025 was never mentioned. The question posed by the HSBC exec is about whether Miami will still exist 100 years into the future. In the case of unmitigated climate change that seems unlikely.